Books about Anguilla

Loading...

Sunday 7 April 2013

WAR ON ANGUILLA NOW IN ITS 4TH DAY, REPORTS NO CASUALTIES, AS BRITISH FORCES MET SMALL POCKET RESISTANCE OF GOATS AND SHEEP

Top British commander concluded that lack of cattle producing
fertilizer reduces Anguilla's military arsenal...    
"We are at War" One must ask why is the government of Anguilla this dysfunctional and not in sync with reality. What is going on in government chambers? "We are at war!" Is the most recent statement coming from Chief Minister Hughes in this week’s printing of the Anguillian; such inflammatory remarks are not helpful to the dialogue. The people of Anguilla want to know where the battleground is, because every Anguillian wants to continue the battle for “the cause!” Then we must know whose battle is Hughes really fighting? 

The Chief Minister accuses the British Government of sabotaging the Anguillian economy in their lack of responsibility for not cooperating with them, (us) and complains how the British is spending heavily in some of the other territories and deliberately destroying Anguilla, but admits this is opinion. It is hard to understand how Mr. Hughes intends to reach any level of cooperation with such rhetoric, and being in a consistent battle with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. If one follows the line of communication on the Framework for Fiscal Responsibility it would appear that this is a proposal that has been in the making for some time and should have been in acted into law since June 2012. Mr. Hughes is obviously very late with his final assessment but still finds it fitting to accuse the British of being irresponsible, even with the Budget of the island being mingled in the debate, there is no objective approach coming from the Anguillian Government. All good things come to an end and this quarrel should have taken place some time ago. Apparently all of the other territories have already signed, sealed and deliver their version of said document and they are the ones getting the cooperation of the British, while Anguilla is playing the spoil child in the grouping with its own demands, and the British is saying; “ talk’s over.” 

British Prime Minister: "We are in this together!"
It is now in excess of three years since this government has taken office and has not been able to forge a mutual exchange with the British Government on anything, and has been forced to cooperate in most instances. Mr. Hughes’s interview with the Anguillian is very much the same as all his interaction with the press on issues with the British government. At some point Mr. Hughes must be told to get matters of the country on his priority agenda and he can schedule his battles with the British later on. 

It is becoming increasingly obvious that Hughes’s issues with the British Government might not necessarily be those of the people of Anguilla, a tirade of unscrupulous remarks and unnecessary unresolved interventions are actually hurting the country, and people are becoming victims of curious government. The economic conditions on Anguilla is dismal and it is no doubt that this is not felt by our government, they being in their zone of comfort, refusing to embrace responsibility in governing for the future of the country. It is now becoming unbearable for us who seem to be in the middle of the road, with no political agenda and no axes to grind to stand back and look on, as a government brings the country to its knees because of the lack of civil conduct. At some point the country must hold them all responsible, together with those closely associated rendering advice that apparently dooms the good character of the island and its people. Nothing has been achieved in three years, which reflects quite negatively on this administration, and Mr. Hughes’s ability to govern. It also diminishes our Honorable Chief Minister to the laughing stock of the region and all of the British Kingdom. 

British Army scared-off by herds of goats and sheep as
they advance District-6, Anguilla's Chief Minister stronghold. 
It should have been contemplated before taking office that dealing with the British Government is a fundamental link to the governing process on Anguilla and is, “business as usual” for any of the British Territories. For Anguilla to be consistently void of contact or conclusions is inappropriate for a sitting government. It is very unusual for any few wise men not to be heard or get their point across as in the case of the government of Anguilla. If Mr. Hughes would use this energy, “being at war” in positive action, the country we would see visibly forward movement. It is said that a country gets the government of its choosing, and that is certainly the case with Anguilla today. Mr. Hughes and his Government feel exceptional and deserves special consideration in their collaboration with the British Government, who continues to show that they perhaps don’t care to do business with Hughes, and in fact don’t like his business approach and maybe, they just don’t like the man! But in keeping with the reciprocal protocol and its constitutional obligations to the country, Mr. Hughes has an open door with full access on behalf of the people of Anguilla. The British accommodated Mr. Hughes in their London House, listen to his usual rant and set perimeters for concluding the talks, but then rejects any such accommodation while on Territory Anguilla. This is beyond imagination. It would indicate that one party changed positions. If the agenda is set by the British it is appropriate for Mr. Hughes to react on their terms, and a process of hearings from both sides is quite normal. Mr. Hughes is perhaps being awkwardly advised, either from within his government or from the outside; being unable to meet practical working terms with the British. This is the best indication that nothing will be done for the rest of the term under this government, who appears beholden to a few obstinate party intractable(s) with their allegiance to disorder, not to the benefit of all. This is the few that divides the country, in the hope to restart the revolution, to rid us from the grips of the great “Evil”(Britain). It is time for our government, after in excess of three years having delivered nothing but bad news to its people; to take responsibility for the chaos and embrace responsibility for the future. 

Anguilla's Chief Minister whereabouts are unknown
To ask the question, a fight with the British benefits whom? Is worthwhile; it certainly does not help the image of Chief Minister Hughes, because he is known for whom he is, the chaotic situation now hovers over this country once again will diminish his stature, even on a local level and any positive attributes accredited from the last election. The people of Anguilla are actually losing everything they were able to achieve in better times, under a better government; when they felt improvement and their personal conditions actually changed for the better. Where is our allegiance? And whom do we answer too? The British Government still fully governs the island and holds all the cards on deck! Why does Mr. Hughes think that without an orderly process and a respectful tone, the British is subject to his directions? And whose interest is Mr. Hughes serving having a consistent battle on issues of importance to the country unresolved? Well, “being at war must be a fight for the future, and a fight we must win!”

By: Elliot J. Harrigan 

Saturday 6 April 2013

THANK GOD ALMIGHTY, WE'RE FREE AT LAST!!

Hon. Chief Minister of Anguilla: 
Hubert Benjamin Hughes
CHIEF MINISTER PRESS RELEASE

April 05, 2013

My Fellow Anguillians,

Through this medium of the Press Corp invited here this morning to witness my signing on behalf of the Government of Anguilla of the Framework for Fiscal Sustainability and Development (FFSD) with the UK Government, I would like to make the following comments.

As indicated at the most recent public forum on the matter (which was held on 18 March, 2013 at the Rodney MacArthur Rey Auditorium and carried live by several Radio Stations), the UKG in April 2011 submitted for the GoA's consideration a draft Framework termed the Framework for Fiscal Responsibility (FFR) to replace the 2003 Borrowing Guidelines which had served as the prudential guidelines concerning fiscal matters. Those Borrowing Guidelines proved to be inflexible and unable to withstand the rigours of the financial and economic crisis that rocked the World and our small nation since 2008.

It has taken some time to reach this point, but this was necessary, not only to achieve consensus with the UKG and to arrive at an arrangement that both sides can live with but also to secure what is best for you the Anguillian people. The FFR was considered within Government, taken to you the people and also shared with our regional and international development partners for their review and technical support in order to ensure that we were doing the right thing and securing what was best for Anguilla. We also discussed with our sister UK Overseas Territories that were also subject to these arrangements and carefully monitored their realities as a result of their Frameworks in operation. I take this opportunity to thank all who supported us during this process. In short, we took this very seriously.

As indicated at the public forum on 18th March, 2013, following the commencement of formal negotiations in Anguilla in September 2012 and further discussions in London in December 2012 I wrote to the UK Minister with responsibility for the Overseas Territories the Hon Mark Simmonds on December 14, 2012 outlining the GoA's position on the proposed FFR (it should be noted that this correspondence was considered and approved by Executive Council).

Minister Simmonds responded in correspondence dated March 6, 2013 acknowledging the progress that had been made in the negotiations between the two sides to date. He however indicated that the UKG was not prepared to agree to one of the GoA's main requests, namely that the fiscal anchor utilised during the Borrowing Guidelines regime - Debt to Recurrent Revenue - be changed to Debt to GDP.

At the public forum on 18th March, 2013 I indicated that, acting on advice of the GoA technical officials, I along with my Ministerial colleagues were prepared to continue with Debt to Recurrent Revenue fiscal anchor provided that the Framework to be agreed and the enabling legislation would be reviewed 5 years from implementation.

After further discussions in Executive Council and among UKG and GoA technical officials I can state that we have arrived at the point where the new framework, the Framework for Fiscal Sustainability and Development, FFSD, for short, can be signed. 
So my people, what are the next steps?

In Minister Simmonds' letter of 6th March 2013, he spoke to the UKG's undertaking to provide a grant of the equivalent of EC$12.5 million for 2013, demonstrating their commitment to Anguilla's economic growth and development in a bid to ensure that we can undertake crucial projects without using our fiscal reserves. It should be noted that originally we requested a grant of EC$140m over a period of 3 years to support our capital development. However, we accept this proposal and we express our thanks to the UKG. Minister Simmonds spoke to the effect of the UKG and GoA agreeing on a Framework to replace the 2003 Borrowing Guidelines (and within this the establishment of Capital Development Fund endowed with the above mentioned grant) as to, and I quote "put us in a position to move forward quickly to agreement on the 2013 Budget".

We thank Minister Simmonds for this undertaking to move ahead with UKG assent of the GoA's 2013 Budget, which normally should have taken place in December 2012.

Operating on a Provisional Budget, which the GoA has been doing since January 1, 2013, is never ideal and comes with its own set of complications, not only for our internal operations but also for our partnership with the European Union. UKG assent to the GoA's annual budget is a key supporting factor in EU financial support through the European Development Fund (EDF) programme. The 2nd tranche of EDF 10 Funds is expected shortly.

As the Anguillian public would recall, the EU Ambassador to Barbados and the OECS, Mr Michael Barford, attested to this in his comments to the Press a few weeks ago in connection with his visit to attend the 3rd Annual Review of Anguilla's Medium Term Economic Strategy (MTES) covering the period 2010 - 2014.

In closing let me reiterate that we look forward to receiving UKG assent of GoA's 2013 Budget at the soonest but no later than April 30, 2013, the receipt of the EC$12.5 million grant to endow the Capital Development Fund, and we commit that with the support of the UKG in terms of legislative drafting assistance, and adherence with our legislative processes, to have passage of the associated FFSD legislation by 30th June, 2013.

May God bless you, and may God bless Anguilla.