Books about Anguilla

Loading...

Sunday 18 May 2014

ANGUILLIAN POLITICIAN SQUAWKS IN PRIVATE BROTHEL

Reports are now surfacing that a certain District-4 "CHRISTIAN" Politician, a man of the cloth, has frequently used Squawk's (crutches) home as his brothel. In essence, a place where this so-called happily married Anguillian Christian Politician has abused other women, otherwise well known as his Concubines - only God knows! We are trying to contact Percy Thomas, for confirmation and comment.

It was Robert Kennedy who once said, “What is objectionable, what is dangerous about extremists, is not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant. The evil is not what they say about their cause, but what they say about their opponents.” Most voters on Anguilla are still fearful of the holy-lynching ordained by an extremist man of the cloth on Anguilla in the 2010-General Elections. Whether this whoring politician actions are derivatives as ordained by God, is yet to be publicly condoned or otherwise rejected by the religious extremist on Anguilla. These are those who mix religion and politics, and often think that they are heaven-sent when they are really just hell-bent! 

These religious/political zealots are doing more harm to our youths and the cause of Christ on Anguilla than Satan himself. With such absurdity, cruelty and ungodly hypocrisy that have characterized the Anguilla United Movement (AUM) for the last 4+ years, She has indeed driven our youths away from God into a dark place... a generation that has been living without God, and with no rational need for God. If all I knew of God was what I had seen from this reckless not-fit-for-purpose say-anything-to-win bunch, I too would not be eager to make His acquaintance. 

The mockery in Anguilla politics is that too often what is presented as theology or history by these Anguillian religious extremists is nothing more than canonized opinion passed off as fact or truth in religion and politics, but in reality a fantasy, a fallacy, or a falsehood. And this continue to be the problem with the ole AUM party and its new cheek of the same asshole, is that in its religion and its politics, its salesmanship exceeds its craftsmanship in delivering an empty legacy, or a dismal future.

God and religion are not synonymous, as the empty vessels would want you to believe. God is, to the faithful, the sovereign omnipotent creator of all creation. Religion is what the AUM tries to hoodwink you with. Too often, religion worships serves that which has nothing to do with God, worships money and serves politics, worships charisma and serves ego, worships intolerance and serves self… the characterization of a fallen Christian.

More to come, as we are endeavor to clean out closets for elections-2015.

By: Realist Spikenice
Candidate against the Anguilla Utter Mess (AUM)

Sunday 11 May 2014

THE ANGUILLA UNITED MOVEMENT (AUM) - THE LAST BRITISH OVERSEAS POLITICAL DISGRACE?

MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS

The AUM grand spectacle on Saturday May 3, 2014 -
listen here
As this election campaign progresses we the Members of the Anguilla United Front do not intend to allow lies and loose comments from our opponents to go unattended. We intend to respond swiftly so as to ensure that such misinformation does not become a determining factor in the choices voters make in the next general election. It is my sincere wish that first time candidates, especially, will not get caught up in the style of negative politics that seems to have become a “best practice” for some members of the Anguilla United Movement. However, the AUM launch on Saturday May 3, 2014 did not lend much hope to the realization of such a wish. On the contrary, a number of platform speakers gave us a clear indication that the AUM has no intention of assisting us in “raising the bar” in politics any time soon.

Let me take this opportunity to congratulate the AUM “ first time candidates”, in particular, for making the decision to take the plunge in national politics. You have embarked on a journey that will put your “mettle” to the test. Politics is certainly not an avocation for the timid --- yet it calls for compassion and caring. Anguilla needs committed and dedicated men and women equipped to be leaders in the twenty-first century. Much is expected of you in victory as well as defeat. Let us raise the bar!

I do not intend to do a post mortem of the Anguilla United Movement’s launch in this presentation but I do feel duty bound to respond to a few of the many statements and recurring themes that were designed and formulated to distort reality. For example my representative, the Honourable Evan Gumbs suggested that now that he is in Government he has the facts to substantiate allegations that they make in the House of Assembly and other platforms about the past Government, including myself. I therefore challenge Mr. Gumbs and his colleagues in the Anguilla United Movement to present and publish those facts for the people of Anguilla to examine and finally bring closure to the suspense that surrounds these baseless accusations. We will not allow the AUM to continue to use these false statements to create a cloud of suspicion over members of our party. It is time “to put up or shut up”. 

Like many of the others, one speaker on the platform gave an expose’ about how well the Government has been managing the affairs of Anguilla. In his presentation one of the things he said was that the Government is doing so well that it has EC$29 million in reserves. He then, as usual, proceeded to judge the Anguilla United Front Government on the basis of our last eighteen months in office in total disregard to the many years of growth and prosperity we delivered based on our policies.

But since this AUM Government came to office all we have been hearing about is taxation and expenditure controls. Taxation and expenditure management are only two sides of the development equation. That equation has many sides. And one of the most important is private sector investment --- be it local investment or foreign direct investment, both are critical. It is time for the Government to direct the FCO’s attention away from “taxing a dead economy”. We should be asking the FCO to direct us to their Department of Trade and Commerce so as to help us to design programs to attract qualified British and European investors for a number of our failed projects or provide financing for qualified local projects.

Instead the AUM Government is talking about surpluses and reserves while people are losing jobs and business opportunities; banks are foreclosing on mortgages and people are losing their homes and property; the island is rationing water; there are many homes and families without electricity; there has been little in the way of infrastructure development for almost four years; and people are unable to meet their medical expenses. The island cannot be doing well no matter how neat the columns in our budget looks when our people are experiencing these dire situations.

The AUM deconstructionism of Anguilla -
Hubert Hughes, Josephine Gumbs-Connor
Jerome Roberts, Walcott Rchardson,
Haydn Hughes and Evan Gumbs
Before this economic downturn in 2008 our budget was doing great but in addition our United Front Government was able to deliver EC$ 70 million in road construction; 9 million in school construction; 13 million in seaport development; 60 million in training; 20 million in land acquisition for the future; 70 million in airport expansion and relocation; and 65 million in reserves just to name a few areas. That is a total of almost EC$300 million in direct public sector development. But in addition, we were able to attract almost a billion US dollars in foreign direct investment. All this was not achieved by accident --- it was by a studied approach designed to grow the economy. Because of this increased economic activity we were able to meet our recurrent expenditure and generate massive surpluses without raising taxes. 

To go a step further the surplus referred to is basically a surplus on paper because that entire amount could be wiped out if Government were to pay its public servants the over thirty million EC dollars owed to them and pay up ANGLEC’s outstanding bills of over EC$12 million. So in actual fact there is nothing to boast about and they are simply comparing “apples to oranges”. 

They also spoke about “meeting the Treasury empty”. For the benefit of listeners who can visualize the Treasury safe being opened and totally empty --- that is a situation that occurs on a daily basis. The money goes to the Bank daily. And the Government collects money every day. Yet this Government continues to paint pictures of past Ministers of Government running away with the money out of the Treasury. They should understand by now that the same recession that they met was the conditions that the past Government had been working under for eighteen months before the election. So this charade about meeting the Treasury empty is a dangerous half-truth that many persons fell for after the election and which the AUM seems to want to use again to fire up its base of supporters. 

Another recurring topic was the public debt. Members of the platform continue to give the impression that this Government no longer has any debt. May I point out that at the end of our term the total public debt stood at EC$191 million and today it stands at EC$231million. That is forty million dollars more than when we demitted office. And to make matters worse this figure does not include the EC$30 million owed to civil servants and the EC$12 million owed to ANGLEC. So in actual fact the present public debt can be as high asEC$272 million. In this same vein one of the “first time” platform speakers said that the country is better off today than it was four years ago. To my mind to make such a statement is an insult to the intelligence of persons in the listening audience who have not worked for years; do not have electricity and water; or has lost his property. It is also fair to question where that particular individual was for the last four years.

AUM - The Tree... the remnants of a British
 Overseas Territory last political disgrace
Yet another recurrent theme was “not just for a few”. This term was widely used, by all the speakers probably as code for “the elite”. It is time that the AUM be reminded that the only time that almost 90 % of the population benefitted from our economy was in the AUF boom years 2003 - 2008. Today it is obvious that the majority of the jobs in the construction sector are managed “by a few”. It is time that the AUM moves away from this divisive concept of “ the few” and begin to create an atmosphere of unity and access for all to the Anguilla Dream.

Finally, the attendance at the AUM launch was spiked by the fact that persons from across party lines came to find answers to at least two questions, namely, who will be running in Road South and who will lead the party in the upcoming election. Naturally, with the seemingly convenient absence of the Chief Minister at the official launch of his own party these questions led to other questions and much speculation. Is there a struggle for the leadership among members of the AUM? Is Haydn actually the candidate for Road South or will Hubert eventually sneak in? Truth be told --- this AUM Launch has left us more questions than answers.

By: Mr. Victor F. Banks
Victor Banks is a former Finance, Economics, Commerce and Tourism Minister of Government on Anguilla. He is the leader of the Opposition Anguilla United Front Party, writer and author of a weekly political article for The Anguillian News Paper, lyricist, philanthropist and a self-employed entrepreneur.

Thursday 8 May 2014

... IF HE [CHIEF MINISTER HUBERT HUGHES] IS IN HIS COFFIN


Mr. Colville L. Petty OBE
It has been widely claimed that our Honourable Chief Minister, Hubert Benjamin Hughes, will not be a candidate in the 2015 general elections, so I thought it would be useful to put on record, for the benefit of present and future generations, a brief history of his involvement in elections in Anguilla. Also, I shall comment on the possibility of his candidacy in 2015.

Hubert has been contesting elections since 1961. On 16th November that year he, Kenneth Hazell and Walter Hodge were defeated by Peter Adams in the election to choose Anguilla’s representative in the Legislative Council in St Kitts. Hubert contested that election as a member of the Robert Bradshaw-led St Kitts Labour Party. One thing about him is that he has never denied or disguised his high esteem for Bradshaw. As recent as Wednesday 19th February 2014 he told Keith Stone Greaves’ Anguilla Talk – on Radio Anguilla – that he was always an admirer of Bradshaw.

During the revolutionary years (1967 -1969), Hubert kept a low political profile. He did not contest any of the local elections held during that period. Actually, he dared not because he was strongly opposed to the Revolution. As a matter of fact, he took the position that there was never a Revolution. To quote him at a political meeting at the Webster Park (1981): “The Anguilla Revolution was not a revolution at all, but a skirmish . . . It was lawless people who, for selfish reasons, decided to make some sort of demonstration using the people sentiments”. But once a British administration was established in Anguilla, Hubert was back on the political stage contesting elections. The first one he contested was on 15th March 1976 as an independent candidate in the Electoral District of Road South. He beat the two other independent candidates (Camile Connor and Everet Romney) and was the sole opposition member in the Legislative Assembly. Ronald Webster, whose PPP won six of the seven seats, was appointed Anguilla’s first Chief Minister.

But Webster’s six seats did not save him when Hubert moved a no confidence motion against him on 1st February1977. The motion had the full backing of Webster’s ministerial colleagues, so Webster lost the vote (5 to 2) and Her Majesty’s Commissioner appointed Emile Gumbs as the new Chief Minister. Hubert was appointed political adviser to the Chief Minister but his dissatisfaction with the Gumbs Government, primarily because he was not given a ministerial post, caused him to leave it, within a matter of weeks, and to later join forces with the dethroned Ronald Webster.

When general elections were held on 28th May 1980, Hubert, a member of the Ronald Webster-led AUM (which won six of the seven seats), beat Urban Hazell of the ANA, in Road South, and was appointed Minister of Natural Resources, Tourism and Communications. But Webster’s Government lasted less than a year. Webster had some irreconcilable issues with Claudius Roberts, his Minister of Social Services, whom he fired – and Hubert resigned in sympathy with Roberts (his staunch political ally). Thereupon, the Commissioner dissolved the Assembly on Webster’s advice and fresh elections were called for 22nd June 1981.

The result was victory for Webster’s APP which won five seats including that of Road South where Hubert of the AUM was defeated by Maurice Connor. But Hubert was not out of the Legislature for long because when Webster called a snap election for 9th March 1984 he (Hubert), who ran as an independent, recaptured his seat from Maurice Connor of Webster’s APP which was soundly beaten winning only two seats (Island Harbour going to Nashville Webster and Sandy Hill to Osbourne Fleming). It was the Emile Gumbs-led ANA, which included Belto Hughes (Hubert’s political twin), that formed the new government having won four of the seven seats. On 11th March 1984, two days after the elections, a press release from the ruling ANA stated that Hubert Hughes had applied for membership of the ANA and that his application was approved. The next thing, yer know, Hubert was appointed Minister of Finance. But he and most members of the ANA had much difficulty working as a team so on 19th February 1985 Governor Baillie revoked his ministerial appointment on the advice of Chief Minister Gumbs.

After being expelled from the ANA, Hubert found himself back with Ronald Webster as a member of his new party, the AUP. In the 1989 general elections the AUP won two of the four seats it contested, the winners being Hubert Hughes and Belto Hughes. But it was the Emile Gumbs-led ANA that won three seats which formed the government with the assistance of Osbourne Fleming (Independent).

By the time of 1994 elections, on 16th March, Hubert Hughes and Ronald Webster had parted ways again. Webster formed a new party, the AGG, and Hubert held on to the AUP with himself and Belto winning two of the four seats it contested. The other seats went as follow: ADP – 2 (Victor Banks and Edison ‘Eddy’ Baird); ANA – 2 (Eric Reid and Kenneth Harrigan); and Osbourne Fleming (Independent).

The new government was a coalition of Hubert Hughes’ AUP and Victor Banks’ ADP – with Hubert as Chief Minister. Because Hubert and Victor were longstanding political enemies – nobody expected the coalition to last its 5-year term, but it did. Ironically, it was Victor who told a public meeting, many years earlier, that Hubert would never accede to a position of political leadership in Anguilla because, to quote him (1981): “Jah will never give power to a baldhead [Hubert Hughes]”.

Jah having proved Victor wrong in 1994, proved him wrong again when he gave power to the baldhead a second time following general elections held on 23rd February 1999. The elections resulted in another coalition between Hubert’s AUP and Victor’s ADP, with Hubert as Chief Minister, but it went into collapse mode within a matter of weeks. Victor and Eddy had accused Hubert of “Yeltsin-style leadership” and vowed to halt it. To this end, Victor left the coalition, on 21st May 1999. Eddy did not leave. He refused to follow his party leader. His reason: “I am not going to jump out of a plane without a parachute”. So he did not jump, and I can still hear Victor, on the evening of 21st May, at a political meeting in South Valley, crying: “I am standing alone! Will somebody help me?” But nobody answered his call.

Following Victor’s departure, Hughes’ Government, with Eddy’s support, limped on for several months. However, it could not conduct any business in the House of Assembly because of lack of a quorum. Eventually, Hubert took the Speaker to the High Court to compel him to convene meetings of the House. The issue revolved around whether a two-thirds quorum of the 11-member Assembly, plus the Speaker, was eight or seven. The Speaker took the position that it was 8 while Chief Minister Hughes held it was 7. When Justice Adrian Saunders, on 12th January 2000, ruled in favour of the Speaker, Hubert had no choice but to demit office. General elections were held on 3rd March 2000. Hubert’s AUM won two seats (Hubert in Road South and Belto in West End), while Victor’s ADP and the Osbourne Fleming-led ANA – which campaigned together as the AUF – won four seats resulting in Osbourne heading the government as Chief Minister.
The AUF led by Osbourne Fleming formed the government for a second time following the February 2005 general elections when it held on to its four seats. Edison Baird’s-led ANSA won two, while Hubert won the only seat of five which his AUM had contested.

Five years later, in the 2010 general elections, Hubert was appointed Chief Minister for a third time when his AUM – which included Eddy Baird – won four seats. It was the first time any of the political parties that he led gained enough seats to form a government on its own.

A synopsis of Hubert’s involvement in elections reveals the following: when he contested his first election in 1961, as Anguilla’s representative in the Legislative Council in St Kitts, he was 28 years old. It means therefore that he has been involved in electoral politics for some 53 years. Anguilla began holding separate elections under its own constitution, in 1972, and since 1976 Hubert has contested every one of them. He lost only one – in 1981. To date, therefore, he has contested 10 general elections (won 9 and lost 1) a record in Anguilla’s electoral history. No one in Anguilla has contested more general elections than him. By 2015 he would have sat in the House for 36 years – another record.

Despite Hubert’s lifelong involvement in politics, and despite him having said that he will not contest the 2015 elections, many people feel that his name will be on one of the ballot papers. They are of the view that he will run again if he believes that the AUM cannot be returned to power without him; that he will run to earn the distinction of being the first person to be appointed Chief Minister of Anguilla for a fourth term; that he will run to go down in history as Anguilla’s first Premier whenever a new constitution comes into force; and that he will stay on long enough to lead Anguilla into independence and become Anguilla’s first Prime Minister. They say he is physically fit to carry on.
Frankly speaking, he looks in good shape physically. For a man who will be 82 next year, Hubert doesn’t have a single strand of grey hair on his head. And oh he likes to boast about how fit he is. I still remember him back in 1985 telling a public meeting: “You know I went to the disco the other night and I heard the lil boys say: ‘Eh, eh! How [come] Hubert Hughes could dance so long? I never see a man dance so long!’ I said: ‘Man, I always keep fit!’”

Actually, one seldom hears of Hubert being sick. As far as I can recall he was sick three times. The first was on 25th August 1986 when Eric Reid, Minister of Health and Lands, landed a powerful left hook to his head, in the House of Assembly, throwing him to the floor. He was disoriented for a while but recovered shortly after with some assistance. The second time was in 1989 when Statchel Warner disclosed, at a political meeting, that Hubert was not well – that he was suffering “from verbal diarrhea”. And the third time was in May 2013 when the motor vehicle he was driving ran off the road in George Hill and he ended up with a fractured rib. After brief hospitalization he was fit as a fiddle again.

Time may prove me wrong, but it is my firm view that, barring death, Hubert will lead the AUM in the 2015 general elections. Already I could hear him bragging that he is the cleanest politician in Anguilla – that he is “squeaky clean” and does not take bribes. By the way, several years ago, a foreign businessman offered him a bribe and Hubert did not hide it. Listen to him at a public meeting (1985): “This [wristwatch] is the only bribe I get. But yer know how I get it. He was very clever. He slipped it on my arm. But the way he did it I feel somebody tell him: ‘Hey, you got to push that on da man arm, yer know, because he don’t take bribes’”. Hubert went on: “When I was given this watch I was so frighten . . . I run straight to the Governor with it. I say: ‘Oh Lord, Mr Baillie, dem bribe me!’”.

And, by the way, I do not think he can be bribed not to contest a seat in the 2015 general elections if he feels strongly that the AUM cannot win without him. Furthermore, knowing how Hubert loves politics, and has lived politics, I cannot see him not wanting to die, naturally, in politics. For him to do otherwise would be like committing suicide. That is why I hold the view that the only way he will not contest the 2015 general elections is if he is in his coffin. Another reason for so thinking comes straight from Hubert’s mouth. I heard him over Radio Anguilla, shortly after his recovery from his May 2013 vehicle accident, saying that he was in good shape – that his blood pressure was 120 over 70 and that his doctors were so impressed with the state of his general health that they said he could live for another fifty years. Could one imagine Hubert living another fifty years and not being actively involved in politics? I cannot. Hubert’s name will be on a ballot paper come 2015.

Mr. Colville L. Petty OBE
Colville L. Petty is a columnist for The Anguillian Newspaper. He is also a political scientist, author, writer, historian and curator for the Heritage Collection Museum on Anguilla. He is the immediate past Supervisor of Elections, and a former Permanent Secretary o Anguilla.

Thursday 1 May 2014

ANGUILLA'S CHIEF MINISTER HUBERT B. HUGHES IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, ACCORDING TO HIS FORMER FINANCE MINISTER

An Open Letter to the Chief Minister


In 1989, Statchel Warner, then an Anguilla National
Alliance (ANA) candidate disclosed, at a political
meeting, that Hubert Hughes was not well – that
 he was suffering “from verbal diarrhea” -
otherwise known as "constantly chatting Shit"! 
Dear Mr. Hughes, 

I listened to a clip of your presentation in the Anguilla House of Assembly on Monday April 28, 2014 and I was amazed that as the most senior Member of the House, both in terms of age and service, you continue to believe that the only way to advance yourself in politics is to destroy your opponents --- “ by any means necessary”. The means that you have used most liberally, over the years that I have known you in politics, is the “LIE”. You seem to have absolutely no qualms about lying about anything or anybody --- simply to enhance your image. You have found a way to denigrate any youngster offering himself/herself for political office in Anguilla if they do not appear to support you. Many an aspiring politician has been intimidated and terrorized by your fabrications and defamatory statements.

On the subject of your LIES I speak from experience having taken legal action against you on several occasions. In response you have apologized for and admitted to several counts of lies. The letter and audiotape of your confessions as a liar will be available shortly on the AUF Website for the public to read and listen to.

Even as I write to you today there is yet another “letter before action” to be sent to you in a defamation matter against Osbourne Fleming; Evans McNiel Rogers; Kenneth Harrigan; Eric Reid; and myself, Victor Banks, for statements you made when you appeared on the radio program “On the Spot!” aired on Klass FM (92.9) on September 13, 2013. My colleagues and I in the past Anguilla United Front Government have taken this joint action in the interest of dissuading young and aspiring politicians from following this shameful path.

... 80+ year old Anguillian Chief Minister is said to contest
next general elections to pay for LIES!
Mr. Hughes, it is my understanding that you have decided that at the end of this term you will no longer seek political office. At the age of 80 I would consider this to be a sensible decision, despite the fact that you seem to be in excellent physical condition. You are indeed blessed in this regard. Yet, it is also in this regard that I am concerned that you seem content to be leaving a legacy of lies; defamation; and character assassination. Most discerning Anguillans consider this to be the style of politics that you have embraced over the years. But few Anguillans hold this style of politics in high regard. From your presentation it is apparent that you have no intention of changing that style even down to your last day of office. 

As usual the essence of your presentation on Monday was to find a way to place me in the way of blame so as to exonerate yourself. And as usual you again exploited the shelter of parliamentary privilege in the House to deliver a cowardly stream of lies to the listening audience. You constructed that litany of lies, in order to blame others for the severe damage you and your Government caused to the Water Production and Distribution System in Anguilla since coming to Office. The situation of water in Anguilla is worse than at any period since the Anguilla Revolution and the blame must be placed squarely on the incompetence of your Government. You because of your unwillingness to negotiate effectively with GE, the Water Producers in Crocus Bay, have allowed that plant to be dismantled and shipped out of Anguilla without a viable alternative. To make matters worse there are letters signed by you indicating your willingness to lease the said lands for tourism development without any clear provisions made to secure the infrastructure for future water production. If this is followed through, your actions will negatively impact the provision of water services to the people of Anguilla for many years to come. Mr.Hughes you cannot blame this on any other Government but your Government of the last four years. This is your baby! It has your DNA! 

Mr. Hughes, I must admit that my first response to your cowardly and lying comments in the House of Assembly on Monday was ANGER. However, as you continued to expand on your lies; your response to the Leader of the Opposition’s challenge that you should present the documentation and repeat your comments outside the shelter of parliament evoked PITY. 

Mr. Hughes for ease of reference let me quote the statement you made in the House of Assembly. After establishing clearly that you were speaking about me you said: 

On 25th August 1986, the Hon. Eric Reid, then Minister 
of Health and Lands, landed a powerful left hook to then 
Opposition Leader Hubert Hughes' head, for LIES, in the 
House of Assembly, throwing him flat to the floor. He 
was disoriented  for a while but recovered shortly after
with some assistance. 
“….. that same Minister of Finance, documents came from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, where he put, he demanded that certain amount of extra money be put on to the unit of water --- it was supposed to be 2.5 he said put on an extra 1.5 “For the kickbacks!” That comes from the Foreign Office --- all those documentations are there, where the former Minister of Finance at the time he was negotiating with this company for kickbacks. ---- 2.5 and 1.5extra.” 

Mr. Hughes this is the first time that you have made an accusation about me and have been so specific. You said: “ he said put on an extra 1.5 for the kickbacks” In this context, even though you have said it from the shelter of the House of Assembly I take this accusation very seriously. I also took note of the fact that after you were challenged by the Leader of the Opposition, Hon. Evans McNiel Rogers to produce the documentation to the House you remarked: “the only politics you all can do is to go to the High Court and intimidate people” . It is obvious from this statement that you feel that it is all right to slander and defame others --- but you believe that those persons do not have the right to defend themselves and seek justice in the judicial system. You seem to consider that defending oneself against slander and defamation is intimidation. It is obvious Chief Minister that you don’t quite get it! If you defame anyone he/she has the right to sue you! If anything it is the defamer should be considered the intimidator. 

Chief Minister I believe that you have forgotten, conveniently perhaps, that when the Water Plant was commissioned it was under your Government. Any allegations of the nature you described therefore do not make sense. How could a Minister in your Government have the power to overrule you and Executive Council (EXCO) and demand “kickbacks”? How can a Minister of your Government travel to New York and sign an agreement with an international firm without the approval of EXCO and you, Chief Minister? Chief Minister you were obviously not in control of your own Government! You must take the blame for that --- not your Minister!

To further emphasize your point Chief Minister you declared: “those facts are at the Foreign Office. The Foreign Office knows that here is a Minister who has been demanding setbacks.” Obviously, Mr. Hughes you destroyed your own credibility by claiming that the British Government is aware of the Minister’s behaviour and is not doing anything about it. Here you have a Minister in your Government demanding kickbacks and the FCO has never asked neither you nor your Minister of Finance a question about the matter? And four years after that Minister has demitted office no one can produce any documents to expose him and bring him to account?

How could you Chief Minister, who is always ready to destroy your opponents, have misplaced such a damaging piece of evidence? It is clear to me that you were ambushed by the Opposition’s attack of the AUM’s mishandling of the Water project in the House and hurriedly put together another one of your lies to shift the blame to me --- your favorite target. I would like to suggest that on this occasion this can only be categorized as a ridiculous lie --- it doesn’t even make sense.

Mr. Victor F. Banks
Fortunately, for you Chief Minister you have been sheltered by “ parliamentary privilege.” But then you already knew that --- which is why you continue to tell LIES in the House of Assembly. Like the Leader of the Opposition I also challenge you to make those statement in the public domain. And to present the documents regarding these charges to the Opposition and other interested parties. In fact, since you have also implicated the Foreign Office, I must also request that she presents any of the documents to which you referred. 

Chief Minister, I have chosen to send you this open letter because I must point out to the people of Anguilla that there is no sure way to the truth through the shelter of the House of Assembly. And that from henceforth through to its dissolution the House will be used as a safe place to lie with impunity. It is an excellent place Chief Minister, for the AUM’s campaign of LIES. Obviously, to use your own words, I will not be able to “intimidate” you with a suit for the lies you told on Monday.

However, Chief Minister might I on the eve of your departure from politics appeal to your sense of posterity and urge you to explain to your colleagues in the AUM as I have to mine in the Anguilla United Front that parliamentary privilege was not conceived so as to create an arena where there is “no holds barred.” On the contrary the concept of “parliamentary privilege” was devised to protect members when they make fair and honest statements rather than to allow them to make unfair and malicious ones. It was devised to encourage freedom in discussing complex issues rather than granting freedom to deliberately distort the facts. It was devised to encourage democracy rather than to stifle freedom of expression. In short parliamentary privilege is not to facilitate lies but rather to evoke the truth. 

Chief Minister, when I was expressing my frustration with the way parliamentary privilege is abused a good friend said to me: “You know the fact that parliamentarians are called “Honourable” should make them more honest, courteous and accountable while in the House than anywhere else. Why should someone be telling lies and defaming his colleagues in an Honourable House?” Why? Why Indeed!

By: Mr. Victor F. Banks
Victor Banks is a former Finance, Economics, Commerce and Tourism Minister of Government on Anguilla. He is the leader of the Opposition Anguilla United Front Party, writer and author of a weekly political article for The Anguillian News Paper, lyricist, philanthropist and a self-employed entrepreneur.